Edison Ambarzumjan vs Marc Majdandzic Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 29 Oct at 01:22 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
E. Ambarzumjan vs M. Majdandzic

GER
0
Win
Played
1
Win

GER
0
Win
Played
1
Win
Head-to-head: Ambarzumjan 0 - 1 Majdandzic
They have played 2 sets in total, with Edison Ambarzumjan winning 0 and Marc Majdandzic winning 2. The last match between Marc Majdandzic and Edison Ambarzumjan was at the M15 Malta, 29-10-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Marc Majdandzic getting the victory 6-4 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Ambarzumjan | 0 |
| Majdandzic | 1 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) M15 Malta(10-29-25)
E. Ambarzumjan vs M. Majdandzic H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 49.31% (71-73) | Career Total W/L | 53.77% (57-49) |
| 0 | Hard | 1 |
| 0 | Total H2H Matches | 1 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
E. Ambarzumjan vs M. Majdandzic Match Preview:
- Edison Ambarzumjan's second serve win rate is 45.92%, slightly outperforming Marc Majdandzic, who has a 43.97% win rate. Does this give Edison an edge? It might indicate a marginal advantage.
- In return games, Marc Majdandzic leads with a 46.34% success rate on opponents' second serves, while Edison Ambarzumjan is at 43.05%. For first-serve returns, Marc again edges Edison with 30.45% compared to 29.48%.
- Under pressure, Edison excels in breakpoint situations, saving 60.92% in recent form, outperforming Marc's 49.21%. Could this be critical in close match scenarios? It might be.
- Over the last year, Marc has a more favorable match win rate, securing victory in 64.15% of matches, while Edison has won 48.65%.
- Regarding surface preferences, Edison performs best on Grass with a 67% win rate, whereas Marc is most successful on Hard courts, also at 67%.
- Both players primarily compete on the Futures/Satellites/ITF circuit, yet Marc has a stronger record at 64.15% compared to Edison's 48.65%.
- In terms of opponent quality, Edison has faced higher-ranked rivals, with an average rank of 179.68, against Marc's 203.68.
- If a deciding set occurs, Marc's performance is superior, winning 42% of these scenarios, while Edison has managed 27%.
- Current tournament form and specific event performance should also be monitored for further insights into their chances.
Editorial Prediction (October 29, 2025, UTC):
When comparing recent performances and specific match statistics, Marc Majdandzic appears to have a slight overall advantage over Edison Ambarzumjan. Despite Edison showing resilience under pressure, Marc's stronger return game and higher win rate in deciding sets highlight a more consistent match performance. Additionally, Marc's overall success rate in matches over the past year demonstrates better form in competition level matches.
Although Edison has faced tougher opponents on average, Marc's ability to close matches, particularly in decisive sets, and his proficiency on Hard courts might prove crucial.
Considering these factors, Marc Majdandzic is favored to win the upcoming match.
Edison Ambarzumjan vs Marc Majdandzic Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
E. Ambarzumjan vs M. Majdandzic H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches Won | 1 |
| 0 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 7 | Games Won | 12 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
| 5 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 1:24:52 | Average Match Time | 1:24:52 |
| 55% (32/58) | 1st Serve % | 68% (44/65) |
| 59% (19/32) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (28/44) |
| 35% (9/26) | 2nd Serve Win % | 57% (12/21) |
| 67% (2/3) | Break Pts Won % | 57% (4/7) |
| 38% (25/65) | Return Points Win % | 52% (30/58) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
E. Ambarzumjan Recent Matches Played
M. Majdandzic Recent Matches Played

E. Ambarzumjan vs M. Majdandzic Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 49.31% (71/73) | YTD Win/Loss | 53.77% (57/49) |
| 50.62% (164/160) | Sets Win/Loss | 53.88% (132/113) |
| 49.89% (1608/1615) | Games Win/Loss | 52.29% (1231/1123) |
| 51.35% (19/18) | Hard Win/Loss | 69.23% (18/8) |
| 51.32% (39/37) | Clay Win/Loss | 45.31% (29/35) |
| 39.29% (11/17) | Indoor Hard W/L | 62.50% (10/6) |
| 66.67% (2/1) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.11 | Aces Per Game | 0.16 |
| 181 | Aces Total | 182 |
| 0.11 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.18 |
| 172 | Total Double Faults | 211 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 209 | Average Opponent Rank | 280.24 |
| 59% (2989/5082) | 1st Serve % | 65% (2971/4601) |
| 64% (1916/2989) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (1913/2971) |
| 48% (1006/2093) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (788/1630) |
| 41% (173/424) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 37% (157/423) |
| 38% (1918/4988) | Return Points Win % | 38% (1680/4424) |
| 50.00% (1/1) | Challenger W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 49.30% (70/72) | Futures W/L | 54.29% (57/48) |
| 49% (71/144) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 54% (57/106) |
| 58% (21/36) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 30% (6/20) |
| 39% (14/36) | Deciding Set Win % | 45% (15/33) |
| 85% (74/63) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (58/49) |
| 15% (74/11) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (58/9) |
| 11% (70/8) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 17% (48/8) |